Key result
Higher-dose edoxaban reduced stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin (1.34% vs 2.62%; HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.31-0.90; P=0.02) in East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Does edoxaban reduce stroke or systemic embolism events compared to warfarin in East Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=1,943)
double-blind, double-dummy
randomized
Yes
Does edoxaban reduce stroke or systemic embolism events compared to warfarin in East Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
In East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation, edoxaban provides superior efficacy for stroke prevention and superior safety regarding major bleeding compared to warfarin.
Supports higher-dose edoxaban over warfarin for East Asian AF patients; extends RCT evidence to this population.
BACKGROUND: In the multinational, double-blind, double-dummy ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 phase 3 study, once-daily edoxaban was non-inferior to warfarin for prevention of stroke or systemic embolism event (SEE) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of edoxaban in patients from East Asia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients aged ≥21 years with documented AF and CHADS score ≥2 were randomized to receive once-daily edoxaban higher-dose (60 mg) or lower-dose (30 mg) regimen or warfarin dose-adjusted to an international normalized ratio of 2.0-3.0. Patients with a creatinine clearance of 30-50 ml/min, weighing ≤60 kg, or receiving strong p-glycoprotein inhibitors at randomization or during the study received a 50% dose reduction of edoxaban or matched placebo. This prespecified subanalysis included 1,943 patients from Japan, China, Taiwan, and South Korea. The annualized rate of stroke/SEE for higher-dose edoxaban was 1.34% vs. 2.62% for warfarin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.90, P=0.02) and 2.52% for lower-dose edoxaban (HR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.63-1.54, P=0.93). Compared with warfarin (4.80%), major bleeding was significantly reduced for the higher-dose (2.86%; HR, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, P=0.011) and lower-dose regimens (1.59%; HR, 0.34; 95% CI: 0.21-0.54, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily edoxaban provided similar efficacy to warfarin while reducing major bleeding risk in the East Asian population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamashita et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) (n=1,943). edoxaban vs. warfarin was evaluated on stroke or systemic embolism event (SEE) (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.90, p=0.02). Higher-dose edoxaban reduced stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin (1.34% vs 2.62%; HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.31-0.90; P=0.02) in East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: