Key result
White AF patients achieve better warfarin control and fewer strokes and bleeds than non-white ethnicities.
Why the study?
Warfarin reduces stroke in AF but requires monitoring via time in therapeutic range, prompting a review focused on AF prevalence, anticoagulation control quality, and clinical outcomes across different ethnic groups.
Does ethnicity affect the quality of anticoagulation control and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving warfarin?
Does ethnicity affect the quality of anticoagulation control and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving warfarin?
There are significant ethnic disparities in warfarin anticoagulation control, with non-white patients experiencing poorer time in therapeutic range and higher rates of adverse clinical outcomes like stroke and bleeding.
Ethnic disparities may warrant closer INR monitoring in non-white AF patients; leaves open optimal strategies for prospective validation.
Vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin reduces the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Since warfarin has a narrow therapeutic index, its administration needs to be regularly monitored to avoid any adverse clinical outcomes such as stroke and bleeding. The quality of anticoagulation control with warfarin therapy can be measured by using time in therapeutic range (TTR). This review focuses on the prevalence of AF, quality of anticoagulation control (TTR) and adverse clinical outcome in AF patients within different ethnic groups receiving warfarin therapy for stroke prevention. A literature search was conducted in Embase and PubMed using keywords of “prevalence,” “atrial fibrillation,” “stroke prevention,” “oral anticoagulants,” “warfarin,” “ethnicities,” “race” “time in therapeutic range,” “adverse clinical outcome,” “stroke, bleeding.” Articles published by 1st February 2020 were included. Forty-one studies were included in the final review consisting of AF prevalence ( n = 14 studies), time in therapeutic range ( n = 18 studies), adverse clinical outcome ( n = 9 studies) within different ethnic groups. Findings indicate that higher prevalence of AF but better anticoagulation control among the Whites as compared to other ethnicities. Of note, non-whites had higher risk of strokes and bleeding outcomes while on warfarin therapy. Addressing disparities in prevention and healthcare resource allocation could potentially improve AF-related outcomes in minorities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zawawi et al. (2021) conducted a review in Atrial Fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) vs. Different ethnic groups (Whites vs. non-Whites) was evaluated on Time in therapeutic range (TTR), prevalence of AF, and adverse clinical outcomes. White patients had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation but achieved better anticoagulation control with warfarin compared to non-white ethnicities, who experienced higher risks of stroke and bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: