This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We examined the motor unit action potential amplitude versus recruitment threshold relationship (MUAP AMP ‐RT) as an indicator of MU‐specific hypertrophy following high‐intensity exercise training in females. Participants were assigned to either a high‐intensity exercise (EX, n = 9) or control (CON, n = 18) condition and completed pre‐ (PRE) and post‐testing (POST) during which maximal voluntary isometric leg extension strength (MVIT), vastus lateralis (VL) muscle cross sectional area (mCSA), whole leg skeletal muscle mass (SMM RL ), and high‐density surface EMG (HD‐sEMG) signals were recorded from the VL during an isometric ramp contraction at 70% MVIT. The HD‐sEMG signals were decomposed and yielded a MUAP AMP and an absolute (ABS; Nm) and normalized (NORM; %MVIC) RT for each MU. Individual MUAP AMP ‐RT slopes and intercepts were calculated for each subject. Changes in the pooled MUAP AMP ‐RT relationships for each group were also examined. Finally, relationships among individual changes in slopes of MUAP AMP ‐RT and individual changes in mCSA and SMM RL were examined. Training elicited increases in MVIT (+18%), mCSA (+12%), and mean and pooled slopes of MUAP AMP ‐RT NORM . The individual changes in slopes of both the MUAP AMP ‐RT relationships were moderately to strongly ( r = 0.48–0.68) related to changes in mCSA and SMM RL . Eight‐weeks of high‐intensity exercise elicited increases in MUAP AMP ‐RT slope in females. Further, the observed change in slope was related to both VL mCSA and SMM of the tested leg. However, changes in slope for the MUAP AMP ‐RT relationship were more subdued when MUAP AMP was expressed relative to the absolute versus relative RT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jenkins et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: