Key result
Cranial MRI at 1.5 Tesla in patients with conventional cardiac pacemakers resulted in no complications, arrhythmias, or significant changes in pacing capture or sensing thresholds over 12 months.
Why the study?
Does a standardized safety protocol allow patients with conventional cardiac pacemakers to safely undergo 1.5T cranial MRI without device dysfunction or clinical complications?
Cohort (n=356)
No
Does a standardized safety protocol allow patients with conventional cardiac pacemakers to safely undergo 1.5T cranial MRI without device dysfunction or clinical complications?
Cranial MRI at 1.5T can be safely performed in patients with conventional pacemakers using a standardized protocol with reprogramming and continuous monitoring, without long-term adverse effects on lead integrity or device function.
Supports protocol-based 1.5T cranial MRI in conventional pacemakers; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Conventional cardiac pacemakers are still often regarded as a contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We conducted this study to support the hypothesis that it is safe to scan patients with cardiac pacemakers in a 1.5 Tesla MRI, if close supervision and monitoring as well as adequate pre- and postscan programming is provided. METHODS: We followed up 356 patients (age 61.3 ± 9.1 yrs., 229 men) with single (n = 132) or dual chamber (n = 224) cardiac pacemakers and urgent indication for a cranial MRI for 12 months. The scans were performed at 1.5T. During the scan patients were monitored with a 3-lead ECG and pulse oximetry. Prior to the scan pacemakers were programmed according to our own protocol. RESULTS: All 356 scans were completed without complications. No arrhythmias were induced, programmed parameters remained unchanged. No pacemaker dysfunction was identified. Follow-up examinations were performed immediately, 2 weeks, 2, 6, and 12 months after the scan. There was no significant change of pacing capture threshold (ventricular 0.9 ± 0.4 V@0.4 ms, atrial 0.9 ± 0.3 V@0.4 ms) immediately (ventricular 1.0 ± 0.3 V@0.4 ms, atrial 0.9 ± 0.4 V@0.4 ms) or at 12 months follow-up examinations (ventricular 0.9 ± 0.2 V@0.4 ms, atrial 0.9 ± 0.3 V@0.4 ms). There was no significant change in sensing threshold (8.0 ± 4.0 mV vs. 8.1 ± 4.2 mV ventricular lead, 2.0 ± 0.9 mV vs. 2.1 ± 1.0 mV atrial lead) or lead impedance (ventricular 584 ± 179 Ω vs. 578 ± 188 Ω, atrial 534 ± 176 Ω vs. 532 ± 169 Ω) after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: This supports the evidence that patients with conventional pacemakers can safely undergo cranial MRI in a 1.5T system with suitable preparation, supervision and precautions. Long term follow-up did not reveal significant changes in pacing capture nor sensing threshold.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muehling et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Patients with conventional cardiac pacemakers needing urgent cranial MRI (n=356). Cranial MRI at 1.5 Tesla vs. Pre-MRI baseline was evaluated on Ventricular pacing capture threshold at 12 months (V@0.4 ms). Cranial MRI at 1.5 Tesla in patients with conventional cardiac pacemakers resulted in no complications, arrhythmias, or significant changes in pacing capture or sensing thresholds over 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: