Key result
Hybrid adaptive controller enables soft robots to track trajectories with ~3% error despite manufacturing variations.
Why the study?
Producing identical soft robots is challenging due to soft material complexity, yet interchangeability is required for widespread system usage.
A hybrid adaptive controller combining offline LSTM and online kinematics optimization enables interchangeability and accurate trajectory tracking in soft pneumatic robots.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reduces sensitivity to manufacturing variations in soft robots; leaves open translation beyond animal models.
Soft robots have been leveraged in considerable areas like surgery, rehabilitation, and bionics due to their softness, flexibility, and safety. However, it is challenging to produce two same soft robots even with the same mold and manufacturing process owing to the complexity of soft materials. Meanwhile, widespread usage of a system requires the ability to replace inner components without highly affecting system performance, which is interchangeability. Due to the necessity of this property, a hybrid adaptive controller is introduced to achieve interchangeability from the perspective of control approaches. This method utilizes an offline-trained recurrent neural network controller to cope with the nonlinear and delayed response from soft robots. Furthermore, an online optimizing kinematics controller is applied to decrease the error caused by the above neural network controller. Soft pneumatic robots with different deformation properties but the same mold have been included for validation experiments. In the experiments, the systems with different actuation configurations and the different robots follow the desired trajectory with errors of <tex-math notation="LaTeX">3.3± 2.9%</tex-math> and <tex-math notation="LaTeX">4.3± 4.1%</tex-math> compared with the working space length, respectively. Such an adaptive controller also shows good performance on different control frequencies and desired velocities. This controller is also compared with a model-based controller in simulation. This controller endows soft robots with the potential for wide application, and future work may include different offline and online controllers. A weight parameter adjusting strategy may also be proposed in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) studied Soft robot control and interchangeability. Hybrid adaptive controller (LSTM + kinematics) vs. LSTM controller alone was evaluated on Trajectory following error (% of working space length). A hybrid adaptive controller enabled soft robots with different actuation configurations and manufacturing errors to follow desired trajectories with errors of 3.3% and 4.3%, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: