Why the study?
The comparative effects of DPP-4 and SGLT-2 inhibitors on vascular stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk were unclear.
Does empagliflozin improve vascular stiffness compared to sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk?
Observational (n=120)
Open-label
Does empagliflozin improve vascular stiffness compared to sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk?
p-value: p=<0.05
Empagliflozin is more effective than sitagliptin at reducing arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk.
Aim . To study the effect of various classes of glucose-lowering agents (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors) on the vascular stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and high cardiovascular risk. Material and methods. The open-label, prospective 24-week study included 120 patients with T2D and high cardiovascular risk. We evaluated the effect of modern glucose-lowering medications, empagliflozin at a dose of 25 mg/day (SGLT-2 inhibitor) and sitagliptin at a dose of 100 mg/day (DPP-4 inhibitor), on vascular elasticity, central hemodynamic and laboratory parameters. Results . After 24-week therapy, the target glycated hemoglobin level reached 71% and 80% of patients in the sitagliptin and empagliflozin groups, respectively. In both groups, vascular stiffness and central hemodynamic parameters were improved. However, significant changes were recorded only in the empagliflozin (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity decreased by 14,4%, augmentation index — by 6%, central pulse pressure — by 7,8%) (p<0,05). Use of sitagliptin was associated with significant improvements in the lipid profile (total cholesterol decreased by 9,5%, triglycerides — by 21%, low density lipoproteins — by 15,1%; high density lipoproteins increased by 15,7%) (p<0,05). In the empagliflozin group, anthropometric parameters were improved (body mass index decreased by 9,1%, waist circumference — by 4,1%) (p<0,05). Patients in both groups had a significant decrease in HOMA-IR index and highly sensitive C-reactive protein: by 34% and 51,6% in the empagliflozin group and by 31,8% and 22,1% in the sitagliptin group, respectively (p<0,05). Conclusion . The use of empagliflozin is more associated with arterial stiffness decrease in T2D patients with high cardiovascular risk compared with sitagliptin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Недогода et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes with high cardiovascular risk (n=120). Empagliflozin vs. Sitagliptin (100 mg/day) was evaluated on Vascular stiffness and central hemodynamic parameters (including carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity) (p=<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: