This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background/objectives Junk food consumption is rising among university students despite well-documented health risks. This study examines the socio-demographic factors influencing junk food consumption among health professional students in the UAE. Methods A validated, semi-structured questionnaire was used to assess junk-food awareness, consumption patterns, and behavioral preferences among health-professional students. The tool comprised sections on sociodemographic characteristics, awareness of junk food as unhealthy, consumption frequency, portion size, and eating behaviors. Awareness items were scored as 1 = Yes and 0 = No/Do not know, while consumption items were rated on a four-point scale (0–3) based on frequency. Internal consistency of the instrument was confirmed through pilot testing, with Cronbach’s alpha = 0.82 for awareness items and 0.79 for consumption items. Results Awareness of junk food hazards was generally high, especially for items such as pizza (91.4%), bakery products (90.1%), and fried chicken (89.9%). Lower awareness was noted for energy drinks (61%) and sweetened fruit drinks (65.9%). Consumption varied significantly by academic year ( p < 0.001), with Year 2 and Year 3 students reporting the highest intake between meals. Females demonstrated higher awareness ( p = 0.038) and consumption scores ( p = 0.012). Regression analysis identified age, gender, self-rated health, and portion size as significant predictors of BMI ( p < 0.0001). Conclusion Despite high awareness, moderate junk food consumption persists, particularly of beverages. Socio-demographic factors such as age, gender, and self-rated health strongly influence dietary habits. Findings highlight the need for targeted campus-based interventions to reduce unhealthy eating among future healthcare professionals.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edwin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: