This paper starts from the assumption that panpsychism is counterintuitive and metaphysically demanding. A number of philosophers, whilst not denying these negative aspects of the view, think that panpsychism has in its favour that it offers a good explanation of consciousness. In opposition to this, the paper argues that panpsychism cannot help us to explain consciousness, at least not the kind of consciousness we have pre-theoretical reason to believe in.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philip Goff (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: