Key result
Higher engagement with ML-based LVO detection software is linked to a ~2.6-minute faster door-to-groin time.
Why the study?
Does increased care team engagement with automated ML-based LVO detection software improve door-to-groin time in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke?
RCT (n=101)
Yes
Does increased care team engagement with automated ML-based LVO detection software improve door-to-groin time in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Active user engagement with ML-based LVO detection software, rather than just the number of users, is associated with significant improvements in door-to-groin time for acute ischemic stroke.
BACKGROUND: Automated machine learning (ML)-based large vessel occlusion (LVO) detection algorithms have been shown to improve in-hospital workflow metrics including door-to-groin time (DTG). The degree to which care team engagement and interaction are required for these benefits remains incompletely characterized. METHODS: This analysis was conducted as a pre-planned post-hoc analysis of a randomized prospective clinical trial. ML-based LVO detection software was implemented at four comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) from January 1, 2021, to February 27, 2022. Patients were included if they underwent endovascular thrombectomy for LVO acute ischemic stroke. ML software utilization was quantified as the total number of active users and the ratio of the number of comments to the number of patients analyzed by the software by site per week. Primary outcome was the reduction in DTG relative to pre-ML implementation by hospital utilization level. Data are expressed as median (IQR). RESULTS: Among 101 patients who met the inclusion criteria, the median age was 71 years (IQR 59-79), with 48.5% being female. CSC 4 had the greatest number of total active users per week (32.5 (27.5-34.5)), and comment-to-patient ratio per week (5.8 (4.6-6.9)). Increased ML software utilization was associated with improvements in DTG reduction. For every 1 unit increase in the comment-to-patient ratio, DTG time decreased by 2.6 (95% CI -5.09 to -0.13) min, while accounting for site-level random effects. Number of users-to-patient was not associated with a reduction in DTG time (β=-0.22, 95% CI -1.78 to 1.33). CONCLUSIONS: In this post-hoc analysis, user engagement with software, rather than total number of users, was associated with site-specific improvements in DTG time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebirim et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (n=101). Automated machine learning-based large vessel occlusion detection software vs. Pre-ML implementation was evaluated on Reduction in door-to-groin time (DTG) relative to pre-ML implementation by hospital utilization level (MD -2.6, 95% CI -5.09 to -0.13). Higher user engagement with ML-based LVO detection software (comment-to-patient ratio) was associated with a 2.6-minute reduction in door-to-groin time per unit increase (95% CI -5.09 to -0.13).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: