Key result
Preadmission use of calcium channel blockers or beta blockers was not associated with 30-day mortality following ischemic stroke (MRR 0.99 for CCBs, 1.01 for BBs), intracerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Why the study?
Does preadmission use of calcium channel blockers or beta blockers reduce 30-day mortality in patients with first-time stroke?
Cohort (n=100,043)
Yes
Does preadmission use of calcium channel blockers or beta blockers reduce 30-day mortality in patients with first-time stroke?
Effect estimate: MRR 0.99 (95% CI 0.94-1.05)
Absolute Event Rate: 12.4% vs 10.3%
Preadmission use of calcium channel blockers or beta blockers is not associated with improved 30-day mortality following ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
No mortality benefit observed with preadmission CCB or BB use after stroke; leaves open need for prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of preadmission use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and beta blockers (BBs) on stroke mortality remains unclear. We aimed to examine whether preadmission use of CCBs or BBs was associated with improved short-term mortality following ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study using Danish medical registries. We identified all patients with a first-time inpatient diagnosis of stroke between 2004 and 2012 and their comorbidities. We defined CCB/BB use as current use, former use, or non-use. Current use was further classified as new or long-term use. We used Cox regression modeling to compute 30-day mortality rate ratios (MRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: We identified 100,043 patients with a first-time stroke. Of these, 83,736 (83.7%) patients had ischemic stroke, 11,779 (11.8%) had ICH, and 4,528 (4.5%) had SAH. Comparing current users of CCBs or BBs with non-users, we found no association with mortality for ischemic stroke [adjusted 30-day MRR = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.94-1.05) for CCBs and 1.01 (95% CI: 0.96-1.07) for BBs], ICH [adjusted 30-day MRR = 1.05 (95% CI: 0.95-1.16) for CCBs and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.87-1.04) for BBs], or SAH [adjusted 30-day MRR = 1.05 (95% CI: 0.85-1.29) for CCBs and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.72-1.11) for BBs]. Former use of CCBs or BBs was not associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Preadmission use of CCBs or BBs was not associated with 30-day mortality following ischemic stroke, ICH, or SAH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sundbøll et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Stroke (ischemic, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage) (n=100,043). Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) or beta blockers (BBs) vs. Non-use was evaluated on 30-day mortality (ischemic stroke, CCB current use vs non-use) (MRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.05). Preadmission use of calcium channel blockers or beta blockers was not associated with 30-day mortality following ischemic stroke (MRR 0.99 for CCBs, 1.01 for BBs), intracerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: