This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This paper presents a new approach to estimating the conditional probability distribution of multiperiod financial returns. Estimation of the tails of the distribution is particularly important for risk management tools, such as Value-at-Risk models. A popular approach is to assume a Gaussian distribution, and to use a theoretically derived variance expression which is a non-linear function of the holding period, k, and the one-step-ahead volatility forecast, σ̂ₜ₊₁. The new method avoids the need for a distributional assumption by applying quantile regression to the historical returns from a range of different holding periods to produce quantile models which are functions of k and σ̂ₜ₊₁. A neural network is used to estimate the potentially non-linear quantile models. Using daily exchange rates, the approach is compared to GARCH-based quantile estimates. The results suggest that the new method offers a useful alternative for estimating the conditional density.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James W. Taylor (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: