PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 7, 2006The Journal of Law Economics and Organization290 citationsOpen Access

Do the Merits Matter More? The Impact of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

MJMarilyn F. JohnsonKNKaren K. NelsonAPAdam C. Pritchard

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article examines the effect of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) on stockholder lawsuits. We explore the role of restatements, earnings forecasts, and insider trading in the filing and resolution of lawsuits for a sample of high technology firms. Consistent with our predictions, there is a post-PSLRA shift away from litigation based on forward-looking earnings disclosures. Conversely, there is a significantly greater correlation between litigation and both earnings restatements and abnormal insider selling after the PSLRA. Finally, we find a post-PSLRA increase in the likelihood of settlement for cases involving earnings restatements.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Johnson et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12c0db1100fc8528c077e2https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewm015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Do the Merits Matter Less After the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act?2006 · 141 citations
  2. 2The Determinants of 10b-5 Litigation Risk1996 · 95 citations
  3. 3Securities Class Action Settlements [Empirical Analysis]2003 · 26 citations
  4. 4Securities Litigation Reform: The First Year's Experience a Statistical and Legal Analysis of Class Action Securities Fraud Litigation Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 19951997 · 34 citations
  5. 5Detecting Earnings Management2012 · 3,924 citations