Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The use of internal colonial theories to examine racial developments within the United States of America had become almost fashionable by the late 1960 s. A decade later, a study of the political economy of Wales described the internal colonial approach which it criticized as a “new variant of a time-worn model.’ Amongst historians, however, the internal colonial concept does not appear to be as familiar as it is to other social scientists. This article is addressed to historians who do not subscribe unreservedly to Alfred Cobban's belief that sociologists are their natural enemies, and amongst whom some might still be considering the implications of Fernand Braudel's contention that a “general history always requires an overall model, good or bad, against which events can be interpreted. ‘No theory, no history.’” The purpose here is to indicate some uses and characteristics of theories that the internal colonial concept has promoted, to comment briefly about some of the methodological issues which these theories present, and to suggest some benefits that the concept might have for certain types of social and historical enquiry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert J. Hind (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: