This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In this paper, we argue that a paradigmatic shift is occurring in economic geography toward a relational economic geography. This rests on three propositions. First, from a structural perspective economic actors are situated in contexts of social and institutional relations. Second, in dynamic perspective economic processes are path‐dependent, constrained by history. Third, economic processes are contingent in that the agents' strategies and actions are open‐ended. Drawing on Storper's holy trinity, we define four ions as the basis for analysis in economic geography: organization, evolution, innovation, and interaction. Therein, we employ a particular spatial perspective of economic processes using a geographical lens.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bathelt et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: