BACKGROUND: Respite services are recommended as an important support for caregivers of children with life-threatening conditions. However, the benefits of respite have not been convincingly demonstrated through quantitative research. AIM: To determine the impact of out-of home respite care on levels of fatigue, psychological adjustment, quality of life and relationship satisfaction among caregivers of children with life-threatening conditions. DESIGN: A mixed-methods, pre-test and post-test study SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive sample of 58 parental caregivers whose children were admitted to a children's hospice for out-of-home respite over an average of 4 days. RESULTS: Caregivers had below-standard levels of quality of life compared to normative populations. Paired t-tests demonstrated that caregivers' average psychological adjustment scores significantly improved from pre-respite (mean = 13.9, standard error = 0.71) to post-respite (mean = 10.7, standard error = 1); p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval: 1.25-5.11). Furthermore, caregivers' average fatigue scores significantly improved from pre-respite (mean = 14.3, standard error = 0.85) to post-respite (mean = 10.9, standard error = 1.01; p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval: 1.69-7.94), and caregivers' average mental health quality of life scores significantly improved from pre-respite (mean = 44.2, standard error = 1.8) to post-respite (mean = 49.1, standard error = 1.6; p < 0.01, 95% confidence interval: -9.56 to 0.36). Qualitative data showed caregivers sought respite for relief from intensive care provision and believed this was essential to their well-being. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate the effectiveness of out-of-home respite care in improving the fatigue and psychological adjustment of caregivers of children with life-threatening conditions. Study outcomes inform service provision and future research efforts in paediatric palliative care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Remedios et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: