Key result
Multidisciplinary ICU-radiology conferences linked to ~74% fewer imaging-related errors.
Why the study?
Strategies to identify imaging-related error and minimise consequences are important in critically ill patients, prompting investigation into whether multidisciplinary conferences reduce quality management events.
Do multidisciplinary conferences between radiologists and ICU physicians reduce imaging-related errors in critically ill patients?
Observational (n=675)
No
Do multidisciplinary conferences between radiologists and ICU physicians reduce imaging-related errors in critically ill patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 6% vs 22.9%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Structured multidisciplinary conferences between radiologists and ICU physicians significantly reduce imaging-related errors over time.
May support multidisciplinary radiologist-ICU conferences to reduce imaging errors; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Strategies to identify imaging-related error and minimise its consequences are important in the management of critically ill patients. A new quality management (QM) initiative for radiological examinations has been implemented in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting. In regular multidisciplinary conferences (MDCs), radiologists and ICU physicians re-evaluate recent examinations. Structured bilateral feedback is provided to identify errors early. This study aims at investigating its impact on the occurrence of QM events (imaging-related errors). Standardised protocols of all MDCs from 1st of June 2018 through 31st of December 2019 were analysed with regard to categories of QM events (i.e. indication, procedure, report) and resulting consequences. We analysed 241 MDCs with a total of 973 examinations. 14.0% (n = 136/973) of examinations were affected by QM events. The majority of events were report-related (76.3%, n = 106/139, e.g. misinterpreted finding), followed by procedure-related (18.0%, n = 25/139, e.g. technical issue) and indication-related events (5.8%, n = 8/139, e.g. faulty indication). The median time until identification of a QM event (time to MDC) was 2 days (interquartile range = 2). Comparing the first to the second half of the intervention period, the incidence of QM events decreased significantly from 22.9% (n = 109/476) to 6.0% (n = 30/497) (p < 0.0001). Significance of this effect was confirmed by linear regression (p < 0.0001). Establishing structured discussion and feedback between radiologists and intensive care physicians in the form of MDCs is associated with a statistically significant reduction in QM events. These results indicate that MDCs may be one suitable approach to timely identify imaging-related error.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muench et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Intensive care patients (n=675). Multidisciplinary conferences (MDCs) vs. First half of the intervention period was evaluated on Incidence of quality management (QM) events (imaging-related errors) (p=<0.0001). Multidisciplinary conferences between radiologists and intensive care physicians significantly decreased the incidence of imaging-related quality management events from 22.9% to 6.0%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: