Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early survival is critical for sustainable startups to deliver environmental and social value, yet evidence on its predictors is limited. Drawing on resource-based and institutional perspectives, this study examines 140 university-affiliated green startups from 24 European countries in the “Stage Two” finals (2021–2023). Exploratory logistic regression links survival to financing structure, sustainable business-model archetypes, and public visibility. Non-equity grants and awards emerge as the strongest predictor, with equity capital and a Crunchbase profile adding smaller benefits. Economic-value archetypes outperform purely environmental or social ones, while technology-intensive B2B firms show the highest resilience. By combining resource sufficiency with legitimacy signaling, the study advances sustainable entrepreneurship theory and offers practical levers: mission-aligned grants, credible digital footprints, and archetype-specific funding strategies to support founders, investors, and policymakers in strengthening Europe’s sustainability-driven startup ecosystem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skala et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: