Why the study?
Does two-dimensional echocardiography correlate with cardiac catheterization in determining the severity of calcific aortic stenosis?
Does two-dimensional echocardiography correlate with cardiac catheterization in determining the severity of calcific aortic stenosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While 2-D echocardiography is more sensitive than cineangiography for detecting aortic leaflet calcification, it correlates poorly with cardiac catheterization for assessing the severity of aortic stenosis.
This retrospective study correlates the severity of calcific aortic stenosis determined by two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiography with the aortic valve area determined by catheterization in 57 patients. Aortic valve leaflet calcification was diagnosed by cineangiography in 50 (88%) of 57 patients and by 2-D echo in 57 (100%) of 57 patients (p less than 0.025). An agreement between severity of aortic stenosis by catheterization and 2-D echo occurred in 22 (39%) of 57 patients. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses showed no correlation between the severity of aortic stenosis and the 2-D echo variables: left ventricular wall thickness, left ventricular diastolic dimension, left ventricular systolic dimension, aortic root diameter, and left atrial dimension. We conclude that 2-D echo detects aortic leaflet calcification better than cineangiography. However, the severity of aortic stenosis determined by 2-D echo correlates poorly with the severity of aortic stenosis determined by cardiac catheterization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nair et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: