Current scientific knowledge does not support the clinical application of genetic testing for exercise prescription and injury prevention due to low predictive value and lack of evidence.
Current evidence does not support the clinical use of genetic testing for exercise prescription or injury prevention, highlighting the need for large-scale, standardized genomic research.
BACKGROUND: There has been considerable growth in basic knowledge and understanding of how genes are influencing response to exercise training and predisposition to injuries and chronic diseases. On the basis of this knowledge, clinical genetic tests may in the future allow the personalisation and optimisation of physical activity, thus providing an avenue for increased efficiency of exercise prescription for health and disease. RESULTS: This review provides an overview of the current status of genetic testing for the purposes of exercise prescription and injury prevention. As such there are a variety of potential uses for genetic testing, including identification of risks associated with participation in sport and understanding individual response to particular types of exercise. However, there are many challenges remaining before genetic testing has evidence-based practical applications; including adoption of international standards for genomics research, as well as resistance against the agendas driven by direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies. Here we propose a way forward to develop an evidence-based approach to support genetic testing for exercise prescription and injury prevention. CONCLUSION: Based on current knowledge, there is no current clinical application for genetic testing in the area of exercise prescription and injury prevention, however the necessary steps are outlined for the development of evidence-based clinical applications involving genetic testing.
Vlahovich et al. (Wed,) conducted a review in Exercise prescription and injury prevention. Genetic testing was evaluated. Current scientific knowledge does not support the clinical application of genetic testing for exercise prescription and injury prevention due to low predictive value and lack of evidence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: