Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The main purposes of the present article are (a) to exemplify a link between Fleiss's multiple-rater kappa or other analogues and the generalizability (G) coefficient for a single facet design, (b) to explore the possible utility and interpretation of G theory in the study of interrater agreement when the data are measured on a nominal scale, and (c) to explain why the G coefficient is preferred in place of the kappa coefficient and its derived forms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: