Key result
Higher admission fatigue resistance linked to ~1 point better functional recovery per 10s increase.
Why the study?
Hand grip measures offer potential indicators for recovery after hospitalization in older adults, prompting investigation into their prospective associations with post-discharge functional limitations, HRQOL, and survival.
Are grip indicators at admission associated with post-discharge functional recovery, health-related quality of life, and survival in geriatric and hip fracture inpatients?
Cohort (n=258)
Are grip indicators at admission associated with post-discharge functional recovery, health-related quality of life, and survival in geriatric and hip fracture inpatients?
Higher fatigue resistance and grip work at admission are associated with better post-discharge functional recovery in geriatric and hip fracture inpatients.
May aid prognostic assessment in geriatric inpatients; hypothesis-generating, does not yet support clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVES: Hand grip measures offer potential indicators for recovery after hospitalization in older adults. We investigated prospective associations of the grip indicators maximal grip strength (GSmax), fatigue resistance (FR) and grip work (GW) with post-discharge functional limitations, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and survival in older inpatients. METHODS: Grip indicators were evaluated at admission in general geriatric inpatients (GGI, n = 149) and geriatric hip fracture inpatients (HIP, n = 109). Questionnaires on functional limitations (10-40, lower is better) were collected for two weeks pre-admission, admission, three months follow-up, and six months follow-up. HRQOL (-4-10, higher is better) was assessed at admission, three months follow-up and six months follow-up. With individual growth modeling, we established the associations between grip indicators and the outcome trajectories. Three-month survival was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: In GGI, higher FR and GW were associated with better functional recovery from admission to three months follow-up (FR: B = -1.0 points per 10s increase, 95 %CI -1.9, -0.14; GW: B = -0.33 points per 100 kPa × s increase, 95 %CI -0.59, -0.07). HIP with higher grip indicators showed a better functional recovery towards three months follow-up (GSmax: B = -2.4 per 10 kPa increase, 95 %CI -3.9, -0.89; FR: B = -1.1, 95 %CI -2.4, 0.20; GW: B = -0.31, 95 %CI -0.61, -0.02). No or weak associations were found between grip indicators and HRQOL recovery. Hazard ratios pointed towards a better survival for better scores on grip indicators, but associations were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Higher FR and GW at admission were associated with better recovery post-discharge in geriatric inpatients. Future research should examine the added clinical value of grip indicators in addition to known patient characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swart et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in geriatric and hip fracture inpatients (n=258). Grip indicators (maximal grip strength, fatigue resistance, grip work) was evaluated on functional recovery from admission to three months follow-up (B = -1.0 points per 10s increase, 95% CI -1.9, -0.14). Higher fatigue resistance at admission was associated with better functional recovery at three months in general geriatric inpatients (B = -1.0 points per 10s increase, 95% CI -1.9 to -0.14).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: