Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article proposes the concept of transnational publics as a way of overcoming problems of global long-sightedness and stimulating sociological research able to operate on various spatial levels. By contrast, the concept of global civil society is so inclusive as to be almost analytically useless; it gives the mistaken impression that social action is becoming detached from the local and the national. It is theoretically flawed to speak of a global civil society in absence of a global state. To overcome this global long-sightedness we should speak of a plurality of transnational publics rather than a single global civil society. This forces us to identify the social spaces that individuals and social movements construct. We discover two things: transnational publics are not detached from physical space, but imply a transformation of space, combining the local, the national and the transnational in a new way; second, transnational publics are mediated, but also rooted in real people and places.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas Olesen (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: