Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aims To investigate the probability of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) at different body mass index levels compared to matched non‐diabetic controls in a multi‐ethnic population. Materials and methods This was a case‐control study of 90 367 patients with incident diabetes and 362 548 age‐sex‐ethnicity matched controls from UK primary care. The probability of developing T2DM was estimated. Results Case and control patients were 56 years old at index and 56% were male. Patients with T2DM had significantly higher mean BMI levels by about 5 kg/m 2 at diagnosis (32.2 kg/m 2 ) compared to the matched controls (27.4 kg/m 2 ). White E uropeans (n = 79 270), A frican‐ C aribbeans (n = 4115) and S outh A sians (n = 7252) were 58, 48 and 46 years old with a mean BMI of 32.5, 31.1 and 29.2 kg/m 2 , respectively, at diagnosis. More S outh A sians developed T2DM at BMI below 30 kg/m 2 (38%) than W hite E uropeans (26%) and A frican‐ C aribbeans (29%) (all P < .01). Within the 18 to 70‐year age range, S outh A sian males and females had a significantly higher probability of developing diabetes in the continuously measured BMI range of 18 to 30 kg/m 2 , compared to W hite E uropeans and A frican‐ C aribbeans. Across all age groups <70 years, S outh A sians and A frican‐ C aribbeans had a significantly higher probability of developing T2DM in the normal weight and overweight categories, compared to W hite E uropeans. However, this risk pattern of developing diabetes was reversed amongst the obese in all age groups. Conclusion Risk patterns of developing diabetes at different levels of obesity varies among ethnic groups across all ages, while S outh A sians and A frican‐ C aribbeans carry the highest risk at a younger age and at lower adiposity burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: