Key result
Angina pectoris class >2 in mid-life among CHD patients was associated with a higher risk of subsequent memory (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.11-3.02) and attention impairment (OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.34-4.16).
Why the study?
Does severe angina pectoris (class >2) increase the risk of subsequent cognitive impairment in patients with chronic CHD?
Cohort (n=535)
Does severe angina pectoris (class >2) increase the risk of subsequent cognitive impairment in patients with chronic CHD?
Effect estimate: OR 1.83 for memory, OR 2.36 for attention (95% CI 1.11-3.02 for memory, 1.34-4.16 for attention)
p-value: p=0.019 for memory, 0.003 for attention
In patients with preexisting CHD, greater severity of angina pectoris in mid-life is associated with poorer late-life cognitive performance, particularly in memory and attention.
Should not yet change CHD management; leaves open whether severe angina predicts later cognitive decline.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between coronary heart disease (CHD) and cognitive function is not completely elucidated. We examined the association between severity of angina pectoris (AP) in mid-life and subsequent cognitive impairment among CHD patients. METHODS: Severity of AP according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina classification was assessed in a subgroup of people with chronic CHD, who previously participated in a secondary prevention trial. Cognitive performance was evaluated 15±3 years later, using a validated set of computerized cognitive tests (Neurotrax Computerized Cognitive Battery; computing index scores summarizing performance in each cognitive domain and a global cognitive score). We compared the risk of cognitive deficits in participants with AP class >2 to those with AP≤2, adjusting for vascular risk factors, common carotid-intima media thickness (CC-IMT), and presence of carotid plaques. RESULT: Among 535 participants (mean age at baseline 57.9±6.6 y; 95% males), AP class >2 was associated with subsequent poorer performance on tests of memory and attention compared to those with AP class ≤2 (β=-4.3±1.8; P=0.016 and β=-3.6±1.7; P=0.029, respectively) and with a higher risk of having impairment in these domains [odds ratio (95% confidence interval)=1.83 (1.11-3.02); P=0.019 and 2.36 (1.34-4.16); P=0.003, for memory and attention, respectively]. These results were similar after controlling for vascular risk factors; however, the association of AP with memory domain attenuated after adjustment for CC-IMT or presence of carotid plaques. CONCLUSIONS: In people with preexisting CHD, severity of AP is associated with late-life poorer cognitive performance, independent of other vascular risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weinstein et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease (n=535). Angina pectoris class >2 vs. Angina pectoris class ≤2 was evaluated on Cognitive impairment in memory and attention domains (OR 1.83 for memory, OR 2.36 for attention, 95% CI 1.11-3.02 for memory, 1.34-4.16 for attention, p=0.019 for memory, 0.003 for attention). Angina pectoris class >2 in mid-life among CHD patients was associated with a higher risk of subsequent memory (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.11-3.02) and attention impairment (OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.34-4.16).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: