Key result
Atrial ectopy during radiofrequency ablation of AVNRT was significantly more likely to be associated with retrograde slow pathway conduction than junctional ectopy (60% vs 2%, P<0.001).
Why the study?
What are the characteristics and significance of atrial ectopy during radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway in patients with AVNRT?
Observational (n=67)
What are the characteristics and significance of atrial ectopy during radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway in patients with AVNRT?
Atrial ectopy is relatively common during slow pathway ablation and appears closely related to successful ablation in patients with manifest retrograde slow pathway function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Atrial ectopy may mark retrograde slow pathway conduction during AVNRT ablation; leaves open its value as a procedural endpoint.
Atrial ectopy sometimes appears during RF ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, its origin, characteristics, and significance are still unclear. To examine these issues, we analyzed 67 consecutive patients with AVNRT (60 with slow-fast AVNRT and 7 with fast-slow AVNRT), which was successfully eliminated by RF ablation to the sites with a slow potential in 63 patients and with the earliest activations of retrograde slow pathway conduction in 4 patients. During successful RF ablation, junctional ectopy with the activation sequence showing H-A-V at the His-bundle region appeared in 52 patients (group A) and atrial ectopy with negative P waves in the inferior leads preceding the QRS and the activation sequence showing A-H-V at the His-bundle region appeared in 15 patients (group B). Atrial ectopy was associated with (10 patients) or without junctional ectopy (5 patients). Before RF ablation, retrograde slow pathway conduction induced during ventricular burst and/or extrastimulus pacing was more frequently demonstrated in group B than in group A (9/15 [60%] vs 1/52 [2%], P < 0.001). Successful ablation site in group A was distributed between the His-bundle region and coronary sinus ostium, while that in group B was confined mostly to the site anterior to the coronary sinus ostium. In group B, atrial ectopy also appeared in 21% of the unsuccessful RF ablations. In conclusion, atrial ectopy is relatively common during slow pathway ablation and observed in 8% of RF applications overall and 22% of RF applications that successfully eliminated inducible AVNRT. Atrial ectopy appears to be closely related to successful slow pathway ablation among patients with manifest retrograde slow pathway function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsuchiya et al. (1999) conducted an observational in Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (n=67). Atrial ectopy during RF ablation vs. Junctional ectopy during RF ablation was evaluated on Retrograde slow pathway conduction induced during ventricular pacing before RF ablation (p=<0.001). Atrial ectopy during radiofrequency ablation of AVNRT was significantly more likely to be associated with retrograde slow pathway conduction than junctional ectopy (60% vs 2%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: