PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1957Journal of General Microbiology321 citations

Some Thoughts on Bacterial Classification

View Full Paper
PSP. H. A. Sneath

Key Points

  • The aim is to examine the principles behind bacterial classification and the distinction from cataloging.
  • Examined the notions of similarity and taxa in bacterial classification.
  • Discussed the role of hierarchical systems and mathematical methods.
  • Critiqued existing criteria for classification and their inadequacies.
  • Highlighted that similarity is best measured by common features between strains.
  • Argued that no single feature should dominate classification decisions.
  • Established the importance of mathematical methods for a practical classification system.

Abstract

SUMMARY: Scientific classification is virtually a branch of mathematics which describes the overall similarities of organisms. Catalogues do not do this. Many schemes of bacterial taxonomy are not classifications but catalogues. Similarity is best measured by the number of features in common between two strains, while division into taxa is based on correlated features. Other criteria for these two basic ideas are unsatisfactory and cause confusion, and there seems to be no logical reason why any one feature should be given greater weight in classification than any other. Hierarchical systems are a practical necessity, and simple mathematical methods are useful in bacterial classification. It is not necessary to know the evolutionary history of organisms in order to classify them in a scientific manner.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

P. H. A. Sneath (1957) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12df73f7bd4f5c7da705b6https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-17-1-184
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper