The analytic performance of the HemoCue Hb 201+ system was validated to major automatic cell counters in the marketplace and to the previous HemoCue B-Hemoglobin system. In addition, the performance of all instruments was compared against the ICSH reference method. Between 119 and 138 samples were analyzed at 4 different hospitals. In all, 497 patient samples were tested. Imprecision calculated from duplicate samples for all systems ranged from 0.5 to 1.1%. The correlation for all systems against the reference method was better than 0.99 overall, with biases ranging from –0.28 to 0.21 g/dL. Correlations between the new Hb 201+ and ADVIA 120 (Bayer Diagnostics), GEN-S (Beckman Coulter), Sysmex XE 2100, CellDyn 4000 (Abbott), and the HemoCue B-Hemoglobin system showed all r > 0.99. The HemoCue Hb 201+ had a mean bias of 0.10 g/dL from the reference method and between –0.06 to 0.43 g/dL against the other instruments. Imprecision calculated from duplicate samples on the HemoCue Hb 201+ system was 0.75%. The authors conclude that all hemoglobin methods tested including the new HemoCue Hb 201+ system showed excellent correlation and very small bias to the international reference method. The Hb 201+ system yields results that agreed well with all tested systems, with an accuracy and precision similar to the cell counters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bäck et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: