In this letter, we create two types of attacks to investigate in-vehicle network security: replay attack and amplitude-shift attack. We use these two attacks to create attack datasets from two attack-free in-vehicle controller area network bus datasets (dataset-I and dataset-II), which represent a collection of correlated time series data. We develop a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural-network-based model for detecting replay attack and amplitude-shift attack. For attacks on the dataset-I, the LSTM detection model achieves accuracy of 87.8% and 87.9%, and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.63 and 0.88, for replay attack and amplitude-shift attack, respectively. For attacks on the dataset-II, the LSTM detection model achieves accuracy of 83.7% and 83.8%, and AUPRC of 0.53 and 0.75, for replay attack and amplitude-shift attack, respectively. Overall, the LSTM detection model shows improvement in accuracy, precision, recall, and AUPRC over the baseline detection models considered in this letter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: