Key result
Cryoballoon ablation resulted in a 62% success rate at 12 months compared to 76% with radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, with no significant difference (p=0.56).
Why the study?
Does cryoballoon ablation improve success rate at 12 months compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=85)
No
Does cryoballoon ablation improve success rate at 12 months compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 62% vs 76%
p-value: p=0.56
Cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation demonstrated similar 12-month success rates and safety profiles for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Aim: Catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become a new option treatment for drug-resistant and symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to assess the outcomes after radiofrequency and cryoballoon catheter AF ablation. Material and methods: We performed a single-center prospective clinical study enrolling patients who underwent catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF between 2013 and 2015. The main objective was the outcomes after AF ablation by cryoballoon or radiofrequency energy. Follow-up was performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after ablation. Results: A total of 85 patients were included: 64 assigned to radiofrequency and 21 to cryoballoon ablation. Overall success rate at 3, 6 and 12 months post-ablation was 62%, 76% and 75%, respectively. Redo procedure was required in 8 patients (10.3%) at 6 months. Success rate at 12 months was non-significantly higher in radiofrequency ablation group (76% versus 62%; p=0.56). Complication rates were equivalent, without life treating or permanent sequels. Men gender, AF duration, obesity and sleep apnoea syndrome were clinical predictors of AF recurrence at 12 months after procedure. Conclusions: Cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation appear to be safe and effective procedures for AF treatment, with similar success rate. Men gender, AF duration, obesity and sleep apnea syndrome seem to be associated with AF recurrence after ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grecu et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=85). Cryoballoon ablation vs. Radiofrequency ablation was evaluated on Success rate at 12 months (absence of AF recurrence without antiarrhythmic drugs) (p=0.56). Cryoballoon ablation resulted in a 62% success rate at 12 months compared to 76% with radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, with no significant difference (p=0.56).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: