Key result
Preventive drug persistence in high-risk patients is linked to a ~31% lower new ischemic stroke risk.
Why the study?
Although primary and secondary stroke prevention medications are proven, persistent use is required, and drug persistence and its clinical outcomes had received limited study in high-risk stroke populations in China.
Does persistence of drug therapy reduce new stroke and composite vascular events in a high-risk stroke population?
Cohort (n=2,698)
Yes
Does persistence of drug therapy reduce new stroke and composite vascular events in a high-risk stroke population?
Effect estimate: OR 0.69 (95% CI 0.62-0.87)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.74% vs 6.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
In a high-risk stroke population, 4.7-year persistence of preventive drug therapies was low but independently associated with a significantly reduced risk of new ischemic stroke and composite vascular events.
Persistence with preventive therapies was associated with lower recurrent stroke risk; leaves open causality and practice change pending RCTs.
The high-risk stroke populations are significantly associated with an increased risk of stroke or other vascular events. Although proven primary and secondary stroke prevention medications are available, persistent use is required to be effective. However, the persistence of drug therapy and its association with outcomes in the high-risk stroke population have received limited study in China. Hence, according to the China National Stroke Screening Survey (CNSSS) program in 2015, we performed this multicenter population-based cross-sectional survey and prospective cohort study in Sichuan of southwestern China. The residents aged ≥ 40 years volunteered to participate in a face-to-face survey in 8 communities. Subjects with at least three of eight stroke-related risk factors or a history of stroke were defined as high-risk stroke population. The interviewers recorded individuals' medications at a face-to-face survey, and all the high-risk stroke population was followed up for 4.7 years. The persistence of antihypertensives, hypoglycemics, lipid-lowering medications, and antithrombotics for stroke was evaluated. The primary outcome was new stroke. Secondary outcomes included new composite vascular events of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death during follow-up periods. Among 16,892 participants, 2,893 (17.1%) participants were high-risk stroke population and 2,698 (93.3%) participants completed to follow-up. The 4.7-year persistence of therapy rate of antihypertensives, hypoglycemics, lipid-lowering medications, and antithrombotics was 38.0%, 39.9%, 43.9%, and 59.8%, respectively. The total persistence of therapy rate for antihypertensives, hypoglycemics, lipid-lowering medications, and antithrombotics was 47.6% (136/286) in patients with hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and stroke at the same time. During the 4.7-year follow-up, there were 118 (4.4%) new ischemic stroke, 24 (0.9%) hemorrhagic stroke, 53 (2.0%) myocardial infarctions, and 33 (1.2%) deaths. After adjusting for the covariates, 4.7-year persistence of antihypertensives, hypoglycemics, lipid-lowering therapy, antithrombotics, and total persistence was independently associated with less new ischemic stroke and less new composite vascular events. Thus, more effective public education and efforts to understand and enhance the persistence of drug therapy are crucial to improve population health and decrease stroke and other vascular events for the high-risk stroke population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in High-risk stroke population (n=2,698). Persistence of drug therapy (antihypertensives, hypoglycemics, lipid-lowering medications, antithrombotics) vs. Non-persistence of drug therapy was evaluated on New ischemic stroke (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.62-0.87, p=<0.001). In a high-risk stroke population, 4.7-year total persistence of preventive drug therapy was independently associated with a significantly lower risk of new ischemic stroke (OR 0.69) compared to non-persistence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: