Key result
Right ventricular pacing significantly increased the electrical delay to the peak of the local signal in the coronary sinus compared to sinus rhythm (156 ms vs 105 ms, p<0.001), resulting in a predictable activation pattern.
Why the study?
Does right ventricular pacing alter and homogenize electrical delays within the coronary sinus compared to sinus rhythm in patients undergoing CRT implantation?
Observational (n=13)
No
Does right ventricular pacing alter and homogenize electrical delays within the coronary sinus compared to sinus rhythm in patients undergoing CRT implantation?
Right ventricular pacing homogenizes electrical delays in the coronary sinus into a predictable pattern, which may help guide optimal left ventricular lead positioning during CRT implantation.
RV pacing may homogenize CS delays to guide LV lead placement in CRT; leaves open whether this improves outcomes in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: For successful cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) a spatial and electrical separation of right and left ventricular electrodes is essential. The spatial distribution of electrical delays within the coronary sinus (CS) tributaries has not yet been identified. OBJECTIVE: Electrical delays within the CS are described during sinus rhythm (SR) and right ventricular pacing (RVP). A coordinate system grading the mitral ring from 0° to 360° and three vertical segments is proposed to define the lead positions irrespective of individual CS branch orientation. METHODS: In 13 patients undergoing implantation of a CRT device 6±2.5, (median 5) lead positions within the CS were mapped during SR and RVP. The delay to the onset and the peak of the local signal was measured from the earliest QRS activation or the pacing spike. Fluoroscopic positions were compared to localizations on a nonfluoroscopic electrode imaging system. RESULTS: During SR, electrical delays in the CS were inhomogenous in patients with or without left bundle branch block (LBBB). During RVP, the delays increased by 44±32 ms (signal onset from 36±33 ms to 95±30 ms; p<0.001, signal peak from 105±44 ms to 156±30 ms; p<0.001). The activation pattern during RVP was homogeneous and predictable by taking the grading on the CS ring into account: (% QRS) = 78-0.002 (grade-162)(2), p<0.0001. This indicates that 78% of the QRS duration can be expected as a maximum peak delay at 162° on the CS ring. CONCLUSION: Electrical delays within the CS vary during SR, but prolong and become predictable during RVP. A coordinate system helps predicting the local delays and facilitates interindividual comparison of lead positions irrespective of CS branch anatomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scharf et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronisation therapy (n=13). Right ventricular pacing vs. Sinus rhythm was evaluated on Electrical delay to the peak of the local signal within the coronary sinus (ms) (p=<0.001). Right ventricular pacing significantly increased the electrical delay to the peak of the local signal in the coronary sinus compared to sinus rhythm (156 ms vs 105 ms, p<0.001), resulting in a predictable activation pattern.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: