Key result
HMMPolish competes favorably against popular polishers for error correction in RNA virus coding regions.
Why the study?
Third-generation sequencing has a high per-base error rate in coding regions that hampers viral analysis, and existing polishing tools leave room to improve error correction performance.
HMMPolish is a novel bioinformatics pipeline that improves error correction in protein-coding regions of TGS-sequenced RNA viruses.
Access to accurate viral genomes is important to downstream data analysis. Third-generation sequencing (TGS) has recently become a popular platform for virus sequencing because of its long read length. However, its per-base error rate, which is higher than next-generation sequencing, can lead to genomes with errors. Polishing tools are thus needed to correct errors either before or after sequence assembly. Despite promising results of available polishing tools, there is still room to improve the error correction performance to perform more accurate genome assembly. The errors, particularly those in coding regions, can hamper analysis such as linage identification and variant monitoring. In this work, we developed a novel pipeline, HMMPolish, for correcting (polishing) errors in protein-coding regions of known RNA viruses. This tool can be applied to either raw TGS reads or the assembled sequences of the target virus. By utilizing profile Hidden Markov Models of protein families/domains in known viruses, HMMPolish can correct errors that are ignored by available polishers. We extensively validated HMMPolish on 34 datasets that covered four clinically important viruses, including HIV-1, influenza-A, norovirus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. These datasets contain reads with different properties, such as sequencing depth and platforms (PacBio or Nanopore). The benchmark results against popular/representative polishers show that HMMPolish competes favorably on error correction in coding regions of known RNA viruses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2023) studied RNA viruses. HMMPolish vs. Popular/representative polishers was evaluated on Error correction in coding regions. HMMPolish competed favorably against popular polishers for error correction in coding regions of known RNA viruses across 34 validation datasets.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: