Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article the authors outline five types of debriefing and introduce a new type of debriefing, namely, that of debriefing the interpretive researcher. Next they present eight main areas accompanied by example questions to guide the interviewer when debriefing the researcher. They also present five authenticity criteria developed by Guba and Lincoln (1989) and include possible interview questions to document the degree to which the researcher has met these criteria. Finally, using Miles and Huberman's (1994) framework, they illustrate how displays such as matrices can be used to collect, analyze, and interpret debriefing interview data as well as leave an audit trail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Onwuegbuzie et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: