PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 18, 2026Frontiers in Animal Science0 citationsOpen Access

Investigating the relationship between hoof, liver, and heart abnormalities in grain-fed beef cattle (Bos taurus) <30 months at slaughter

View Full Paper
EHEmma HamiltonKAKarly N AndersonAKAshlynn A Kirk

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Hoof abnormalities, liver abscesses, and congestive heart failure (CHF) are animal welfare concerns that have increased in fed cattle. Our objective was to determine whether relationships between these issues exist in fed cattle at slaughter. Each condition was evaluated at a slaughter establishment in the Great Plains region of the United States (1,417 m elevation) on cattle ( Bos taurus , beef-type only) 30 months of age ( N = 398). Statistical analysis was performed to determine relationships between the prevalence of hoof abnormalities, liver abscesses, and CHF between each other and selected carcass characteristics: USDA quality grade (QG), USDA yield grade (YG), hot carcass weight (HCW), ribeye area (REA), and fat thickness (FT). Of the cattle, 85% had at least one hoof abnormality, 13% had a liver abscess, 52% had CHF, and 5% had all three disorders. There were no differences ( p 0.4955) within the proportion of CHF, liver abscess, and hoof abnormality scores. Cattle with both a wide toe and inward curve (421.62 ± 10.45 kg) had lighter carcasses ( p 0.034) than cattle with only an inward curve (460.95 ± 2.72 kg) or cattle with a shovel hoof (470.16 ± 6.79 kg). The HCW was heavier ( p = 0.0295) for cattle with mild CHF (463.60 ± 3.24 kg) than those with no CHF (451.51 ± 3.22 kg). The REA for cattle with no CHF was 103.17 ± 0.93 cm 2 , for those with mild CHF was 104.51 ± 0.88 cm 2 , and for those with severe CHF was 98.63 ± 2.46 cm 2 ( p = 0.0711). There was a greater proportion ( p = 0.0099) of heifers with no CHF (70.97 ± 8.17%) than steers (45.78 ± 2.61%). There were no differences ( p 0.1025) in the REA, FT, and QG across hoof, liver, and CHF scores. Differences were present ( p 0.034) in the HCW between the hoof and CHF scores. Further research is required to guide actions to address the animal welfare and productivity concerns associated with these issues.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hamilton et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12fbcdb761793c20c0e998https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2026.1681955
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessment of the duration of the pain response associated with lameness in dairy cows, and the influence of treatment2008 · 80 citations
  2. 2Pathologic changes associated with experimental lasalocid and monensin toxicosis in cattle1986 · 36 citations
  3. 3A Scientific Conception of Animal Welfare that Reflects Ethical Concerns1997 · 1,062 citations
  4. 4National Beef Quality Audit: survey of producer-related defects and carcass quality and quantity attributes1993 · 75 citations
  5. 5Assessing citizens’ views on the importance of animal welfare and other sustainability aspects in livestock farming using best–worst scaling2023 · 14 citations