The use of policy-based mechanisms significantly reduces the complexity associated with application development and operation. In particular, history-based policies allow the system to base application access decisions on the evaluation of other actions executed in the past. Obligation-based policies enhance this concept with the possibility of enforcing that certain actions will be executed in the future. This is a necessary evolution because some semantics are either easier to express as obligations or cannot be specified using traditional authorization mechanisms. Currently, the absence of enforcement mechanisms for obligation-based policies imposes the implementation of ad-hoc functional constraints. This increases development time and introduces security vulnerabilities into the policy engine. We present a policy platform called Heimdall, which supports the definition and enforcement of obligation-based policies. A prototype implementation is described, together with an evaluation which denotes encouraging results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gama et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: