Game-theoretic modeling demonstrates optimized distributed generator and soft open point placement in multi-voltage networks, balancing stakeholder interests and power consumption.
There are significant differences in distributed generators (DGs) distribution and load characteristics between different voltage levels, which makes it difficult to match sources and loads. We focus on the problem of different consumption capacities at different voltage levels and the divergence of interests among investment entities, and propose a coordinated planning model for DGs and soft open points (SOPs) based on the Stackelberg game. Firstly, a model of a multi‐voltage level distribution networks (DNs) is constructed based on SOPs. Next, the source‐load matching degree is proposed as a measure of the degree of matching between sources and loads in the DN, and the source‐load consumption rate is selected as an indicator to evaluate the impact of the load on DG consumption. Following this, the interest demands of DG investors and distribution company (DisCo) in multi‐voltage levels DN are analyzed, a planning mode based on the Stackelberg game is proposed, and this is solved by combining the genetic algorithm with second‐order cone programming. Finally, the effectiveness of the planning model is tested and verified using an improved IEEE 28‐node system. The results show that the proposed model improves the DG consumption capacity of DNs with multiple voltage levels while protecting the interests of DG investors and DisCo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: