Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
One of the distinctive features of the Syndrome - the persistence of the memory of the Vichy regime in French political and cultural life - is that it has been extremely difficult for an authoritative historical discourse to impose itself. Why does Vichy, and all that the name entails, fascinate and even obsess the French, inflecting not only discussions of the past but of the present as well? In Afterlife, Richard J. Golsan explores the complexities of some of the most provocative episodes of Vichy's curious persistence in France's national consciousness. He argues that each of these episodes, events, and scandals constitutes a crossroads where history and counterhistory - different or competing versions of the past - encounter one another, often with explosive and even destructive consequences. Richard J. Golsan is a professor of French at Texas A&M University and the author or editor of several books, including Fascism's Return (Nebraska 1997).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cloonan et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: