PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2021Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering102 citationsOpen Access

Towards the updated Italian seismic risk assessment: exposure and vulnerability modelling

AMAngelo MasiSLSergio LagomarsinoMDMauro Dolce

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Within the 2019–2021 research agreement between the Civil Protection Department (DPC) and the Network of University Laboratories for Earthquake Engineering (ReLUIS), the work package WP4 “Seismic Risk Maps—MARS” is specifically devoted to update the 2018 release of the Italian National Seismic Risk Assessment. To this end, the previously considered models of hazard, exposure and vulnerability will be critically reviewed and updated by taking advantage also from the results deriving from other WPs of the DPC-ReLUIS research project. In the present paper some of the most relevant aspects that are being introduced in the development of the new Italian risk maps have been described and shortly analysed. First, a significant upgrade of the vulnerability model implemented in the new version of the platform used for risk calculation (IRMA) is proposed, where reference to the six EMS-98 classes is made also considering regional vulnerability features. Further, empirical data from observed real damage are integrated with results from numerical simulations (mechanical approach), in particular for reinforced concrete buildings. Finally, some special construction types such as schools, churches and bridges are included in order to provide a more comprehensive view of the national risk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Masi et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1303d2f7bd4f5c7da73600https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01065-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Derivation of analytical fragility functions considering modelling uncertainties2014 · 5 citations
  2. 2Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis2004 · 418 citations
  3. 3Presentation of RISK-UE Project2006 · 197 citations
  4. 4Site dependence and record selection schemes for building fragility and regional loss assessment2017 · 94 citations
  5. 5Analytical fragility assessment using unscaled ground motion records2017 · 319 citations