Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">k</tex> -out-of- <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">n</tex> structure is a very popular type of redundancy in fault-tolerant systems. It has been applied in industrial, and military systems. In this paper, we investigate the general residual life (GRL) of a <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(n-k+1)$</tex> -out-of- <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">n</tex> system with i.i.d. components, given that the total number of the failures of components is less than <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$l-1(1leq l≪ kleq n)$</tex> at time <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$tgeq0$</tex> . It is shown that the GRL is decreasing in <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">l</tex> in terms of the likelihood ratio order; Behavior of IFR, and NBU of life distributions are discussed in terms of the monotonicity of GRL. Finally, comparison of the GRL of two <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(n-k+1)$</tex> -out-of- <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">n</tex> systems are conducted given that the lifetime of their components are assumed to be ordered in the hazard rate order.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: