Key result
Intravascular imaging-guided PCI linked to ~51% lower TVF vs angiography in highly complex lesions.
Why the study?
Does intravascular imaging-guided PCI reduce target vessel failure at 3 years in patients with complex coronary artery lesions compared to angiography-guided PCI?
Cohort (n=4,611)
Does intravascular imaging-guided PCI reduce target vessel failure at 3 years in patients with complex coronary artery lesions compared to angiography-guided PCI?
Intravascular imaging-guided PCI reduces target vessel failure across all degrees of lesion complexity, with greater absolute risk reduction observed in patients with more complex lesions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support imaging-guided PCI across complexities; extends RCT data to stratified cohorts while highlighting greater benefit at highest lesion burden.
BACKGROUND: Recent trials have shown that intravascular imaging (IVI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves clinical outcome, as compared to angiography-guided PCI, in complex coronary artery lesions. However, it is unclear whether this benefit is affected by overall lesion complexity in each patient. AIMS: The present study sought to investigate the impact of overall lesion complexity on the benefit of IVI-guided PCI. METHODS: A total of 4,611 patients with complex coronary artery lesions from the RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI trial (n=1,639) and the institutional registry of the Samsung Medical Center (n=2,972) were classified according to the number of complex lesion features found in each patient. The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) at 3 years, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation. RESULTS: The cutoff value for the number of complex lesion features to predict TVF, determined using the maximally selected log-rank test, was 3. Patients with ≥3 complex lesion features had a higher risk of TVF than those with <3 complex lesion features (11.0% vs 7.2%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-1.96; p<0.001). IVI-guided PCI significantly reduced the risk of TVF compared with angiography-guided PCI in both groups (≥3 complex lesion features: 7.4% vs 14.4%, HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.69; p<0.001; <3 complex lesion features: 5.7% vs 8.1%, HR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53-0.98; p=0.039). The benefit of IVI-guided PCI tended to increase as the number of complex lesion features increased (absolute risk reduction for TVF: -0.012 vs -0.027 vs -0.055 vs -0.077, respectively, for 1 vs 2 vs 3 vs ≥4 complex lesion features; interaction p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with complex coronary artery lesions, IVI-guided PCI showed a lower risk of TVF across all degrees of lesion complexity. The prognostic benefit of IVI-guided PCI tended to increase as patients had more complex lesion features. (RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03381872]; Institutional cardiovascular catheterisation database of the Samsung Medical Center [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03870815]).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Complex coronary artery lesions (n=4,611). Intravascular imaging (IVI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Angiography-guided PCI was evaluated on Target vessel failure (TVF) at 3 years, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35-0.69, p=<0.001). Intravascular imaging-guided PCI reduced target vessel failure compared to angiography-guided PCI in patients with ≥3 complex features (7.4% vs 14.4%; HR 0.49) and <3 features (5.7% vs 8.1%; HR 0.72).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: