PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1986Psychological Reports181 citations

Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Three Visual-Analogue Mood Scales

View Full Paper
DCDavid CellaSPSamuel W. Perry

Structured PICO

Are three 100-mm visual-analogue scales reliable and valid for measuring anxiety, depression, and distress compared to standardized measures?

I
Intervention
Three 100-mm visual-analogue scales to measure anxiety, depression, and distress
C
Comparator
Standardized measures of anxiety, depression, and distress
O
Outcome
Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity (correlations with standardized measures)patient reported

Visual-analogue scales for anxiety, depression, and distress are reliable and valid alternatives when standard measures are infeasible.

Abstract

The authors describe three 100-mm visual-analogue scales to measure anxiety, depression, and distress. Test-retest reliability coefficients, correlations within analogue scales, and correlations between analogue scales and standardized measures of anxiety, depression, and distress provided preliminary evidence to support the use of visual-analogue scales when other standard measures are infeasible. Sensitivity to diurnal fluctuation in reported feelings was also documented.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cella et al. (1986) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a130fe35bb7edc7189eaea5https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1986.59.2.827
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper