Key result
Consensus of ~600 experts outlines practical recommendations for VTE prophylaxis across all orthopedic procedures.
Why the study?
Existing guidelines for VTE prophylaxis focused specifically on joint replacement procedures, leading the International Consensus Meeting to develop practical recommendations across all types of orthopedic procedures.
This review provides a comprehensive summary of the International Consensus Meeting recommendations for VTE prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide VTE prophylaxis decisions in orthopedics; leaves open need for prospective validation.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a severe complication that can occur after major orthopedic procedures. As VTE-related morbidity and mortality are a significant concern for both medical professionals and patients, and preventative measures are typically employed. Multiple organizations, including the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS), have developed guidelines for VTE prophylaxis specifically in patients undergoing joint replacement procedures. However, recently, the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) was convened, which brought together over 600 experts from 68 countries and 135 international societies. These experts, spanning a range of medical disciplines including orthopedic surgery, anesthesia, cardiology, hematology, vascular, and internal medicine, conducted a comprehensive review of the literature using a strict Delphi process to generate practical recommendations for VTE prophylaxis across all types of orthopedic procedures. This review article summarizes some of the recommendations of the ICM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uzel et al. (2023) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism in orthopedic surgery. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis was evaluated. Practical recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis across all types of orthopedic procedures were generated by the International Consensus Meeting involving over 600 experts.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: