PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1993Journal of Monetary Economics499 citationsOpen Access

Do recessions permanently change output?

View Full Paper
PBPaul BeaudryGKGary Koop

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This paper examines whether negative innovations to GNP are more or less persistent than positive innovations. We find that once we allow for the impulse response of GNP to be asymmetric, negative innovations to GNP are observed to be much less persistent than positive ones. In particular, the effect of a recession on the forecast of output is found to be negligible after only eight to twelve quarters, while the effect of a positive shock is estimated to be persistent and amplified over time. Our results may therefore help reconcile two antagonistic views about the nature of business cycle fluctuations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Beaudry et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13122bf7bd4f5c7da74dc5https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(93)90042-e
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1"Liquidation" Cycles: Old-Fashioned Real Business Cycle Theory and the Great Depression1990 · 72 citations
  2. 2What Is Left of the Multiplier Accelerator1981 · 62 citations
  3. 3Are Economic Time Series Asymmetric over the Business Cycle?1984 · 950 citations
  4. 4The American Business Cycle: Continuity and Change.1987 · 457 citations
  5. 5Characterizing nonlinearities in business cycles using smooth transition autoregressive models1992 · 913 citations