Key result
Ivabradine, atenolol, and metoprolol reduced resting heart rate by 10 to 20 bpm compared to placebo, whereas verapamil and diltiazem produced marginal reductions of less than 10 bpm.
Why the study?
Do antianginal drugs (diltiazem, verapamil, atenolol, metoprolol, and ivabradine) reduce resting heart rate compared to placebo in patients with stable angina pectoris?
Meta-Analysis
Do antianginal drugs (diltiazem, verapamil, atenolol, metoprolol, and ivabradine) reduce resting heart rate compared to placebo in patients with stable angina pectoris?
Atenolol, metoprolol, and ivabradine provide substantial resting heart rate reductions (-10 to -20 bpm) in stable angina, whereas non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers offer marginal reductions (<10 bpm).
Prioritize atenolol, metoprolol, or ivabradine over non-DHP CCBs for HR control in stable angina; reinforces class-specific effects in Level-1 evidence.
The benefit of heart rate (HR) reduction in patients with stable coronary artery disease is well demonstrated for symptom prevention and relief, and benefits on outcomes are being actively investigated. We aimed to quantify the reduction in resting HR induced by 5 antianginal drugs frequently used for symptom prevention (diltiazem, verapamil, atenolol, metoprolol, and ivabradine) in stable angina pectoris. We identified studies published between 1966 and 2007 in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database and reviewed the bibliographies to locate additional studies. Eligible studies were double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials in patients with stable angina. Trials were combined using weighted mean difference and fixed-effect model meta-analysis. The main outcome measure was resting HR at the study end. For diltiazem, resting HR reduction versus placebo ranged from -0.08 beats per minute (bpm) [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.5 to +1.4] for 120 mg/d to -8.0 bpm (95% CI, -11.1 to -5.0) with 360 mg/d. For sustained-release diltiazem, there was a reduction in resting HR of -4.5 bpm (95% CI, -6.4 to -2.5), with no dose-response relationship (heterogeneity P = 0.62). Resting HR reductions for the other agents were -3.2 bpm (95% CI, -5.1 to -1.3) for verapamil (with no dose-response relationship, heterogeneity P = 0.87); -19.0 bpm (95% CI, -20.4 to -17.6) for atenolol; -13.2 bpm (95% CI, -14.7 to -11.7) for metoprolol (with greater reductions for 150 mg/d and long-acting 190 mg/d); and between -9.3 bpm (95% CI, -13.8 to -4.8) and -19.6 bpm (95% CI, -23.8 to -15.4) for ivabradine. Ivabradine, atenolol, and metoprolol give similar reductions in resting HR (-10 to -20 bpm), whereas verapamil and diltiazem produce only marginal reductions (<10 bpm).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cucherat et al. (2011) conducted a meta-analysis in Stable angina pectoris. Antianginal drugs (diltiazem, verapamil, atenolol, metoprolol, ivabradine) vs. Placebo was evaluated on Resting heart rate at the study end. Ivabradine, atenolol, and metoprolol reduced resting heart rate by 10 to 20 bpm compared to placebo, whereas verapamil and diltiazem produced marginal reductions of less than 10 bpm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: