Key result
Mechanical thrombectomy achieves similar stroke recanalization rates in patients on warfarin versus DOACs.
Why the study?
Outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion were compared between stroke patients anticoagulated with direct oral anticoagulants and those anticoagulated with warfarin.
Does prior anticoagulation with DOACs compared to warfarin affect angiographic and clinical outcomes in LVO stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy?
Observational (n=235)
Yes
Does prior anticoagulation with DOACs compared to warfarin affect angiographic and clinical outcomes in LVO stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy?
Prior anticoagulation with DOACs versus warfarin (therapeutic or non-therapeutic) does not significantly alter angiographic recanalization rates, 3-month functional outcomes, or bleeding risk in LVO stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.
No difference by anticoagulant type; leaves open whether randomized trials would alter thrombectomy decisions in anticoagulated LVO stroke.
Background Outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) were compared between stroke patients anticoagulated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and those anticoagulated with warfarin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From data for 2399 LVO stroke patients in a prospective, multicenter registry, patients with prior oral anticoagulation who underwent MT were analyzed. Angiographic outcomes included successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3). Clinical outcomes included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 at 3 months and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: A total of 235 patients (95 women, median age 78 [interquartile range, 72-84] years) were included. Prescribed anticoagulants were DOACs in 61 patients and warfarin in 174 patients. Of patients on warfarin, 135 (77.6%) had a non-therapeutic therapy (international normalized ration [INR] ≤1.7). Patients on therapeutic warfarin (INR >1.7) had younger age and shorter onset to hospital arrival time than those on non-therapeutic warfarin and DOACs. The achievement of successful recanalization in warfarin groups was similar to the DOACs group, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for therapeutic warfarin versus DOACs of 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-4.89) and non-therapeutic warfarin versus DOACs of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.39-2.20), respectively. The frequency of mRS score 0-2 at 3 months in the therapeutic (aOR, 2.63; 95% CI, 0.86-7.98) and non-therapeutic warfarin (aOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.76-4.09) groups were similar to those in the DOACs group. There was no significant difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Angiographic and clinical outcomes after MT were similar between patients anticoagulated with DOACs and warfarin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koge et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Large vessel occlusion stroke (n=235). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3) (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 0.27-4.89). Mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke yielded similar successful recanalization rates in patients on therapeutic warfarin versus DOACs (aOR 1.14; 95% CI 0.27-4.89).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: