Key result
Unipolar electrograms differentiate reversible from irreversible electroporation areas within 30 minutes after PFA.
Why the study?
The behavior of local electrograms in areas of different electroporation levels after pulsed field ablation remains unknown.
Does unipolar electrogram analysis differentiate between irreversible and reversible electroporation areas following pulsed field ablation in a swine model?
Does unipolar electrogram analysis differentiate between irreversible and reversible electroporation areas following pulsed field ablation in a swine model?
p-value: p=<0.05
Unipolar electrograms can differentiate between reversible and irreversible electroporation areas during the first 30 minutes post-pulsed field ablation, potentially aiding immediate lesion assessment.
Unipolar electrograms may aid early lesion assessment after PFA in swine; leaves open human translation and validation.
BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal cardiac ablation technology based on irreversible electroporation (IRE). While areas of IRE lead to durable lesions, the surrounding regions, where reversible electroporation occurs, recover. The behavior of local electrograms in areas of different electroporation levels remains unknown. The goal of this study is to characterize electrogram dynamics after PFA in IRE and reversible electroporation areas. METHODS: A total of 6 domestic swine were used. PFA was applied in the epicardium of the right and left ventricles using a focal monopolar catheter. Additional radiofrequency ablations were performed. Epicardial unipolar electrograms were acquired at baseline and for 60 minutes post PFA/radiofrequency ablation using a high-density electrode matrix attached to the epicardium. Electrogram dynamics were analyzed in areas corresponding to different levels of electroporation. Acute lesion formation was assessed after 3 to 5 hours by triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining. RESULTS: Electrogram analysis demonstrated a clear association between electrogram changes and the level of electroporation. Immediately after PFA, electrograms displayed the following: a significant decrease in R/S-wave amplitude; a large elevation of the ST-segment; and a large decrease in their |(dV/dt)| max . Marked changes in electrograms were observed beyond the lesion area. Thereafter, a gradual recovery was observed. The evolution of all the electrogram parameters throughout the 60 minutes after PFA was significantly different ( P <0.05) between the IRE and reversible electroporation areas. Acute lesion staining showed significantly larger depth for PFA lesions compared with radiofrequency ablation. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that unipolar electrograms can differentiate between reversible electroporation and IRE areas during the first 30 minutes post ablation. Differences after the first 30 minutes are less evident. Our findings could result useful for immediate lesion assessment after PFA and warrant further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amorós-Figueras et al. (2023) studied this question. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) vs. Radiofrequency ablation was evaluated on Electrogram dynamics in irreversible vs reversible electroporation areas (p=<0.05). Unipolar electrograms differentiated between reversible and irreversible electroporation areas during the first 30 minutes post pulsed field ablation (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: