Observational (n=38)
No
Heart-rate variability signals recorded via lightweight sensors can objectively measure physiological compliance and collaboration quality in real-world settings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HRV synchrony may index collaboration quality; hypothesis-generating for clinical team assessment.
It is known that periods of intense social interaction result in shared patterns in collaborators' physiological signals. However, applied quantitative research on collaboration is hindered due to scarcity of objective metrics of teamwork effectiveness. Indeed, especially in the domain of productive, ecologically-valid activity such as programming, there is a lack of evidence for the most effective, affordable and reliable measures of collaboration quality. In this study we investigate synchrony in physiological signals between collaborating computer science students performing pair-programming exercises in a class room environment. We recorded electrocardiography over the course of a 60 minute programming session, using lightweight physiological sensors. We employ correlation of heart-rate variability features to study social psychophysiological compliance of the collaborating students. We found evident physiological compliance in collaborating dyads' heart-rate variability signals. Furthermore, dyads' self-reported workload was associated with the physiological compliance. Our results show viability of a novel approach to field measurement using lightweight devices in an uncontrolled environment, and suggest that self-reported collaboration quality can be assessed via physiological signals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahonen et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Healthy novice computer science students (n=38). Pair-programming collaboration vs. Randomly shuffled pairs (non-collaborating) was evaluated on Correlation of SDNN (heart-rate variability) in 300-second windows (p=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: