Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The experiments reported examined monitoring for semantically defined targets whilst concurrently shadowing (Experiment I) or listening silently (Experiment II). The word lists for monitoring were either visual or auditory. Monitoring and shadowing accuracy showed less interference when presentation was bimodal than when it was dichotic. However, monitoring latency and recognition memory for shadowed material did not show this effect. It is argued that these data reveal the existence of a number of different sources of potential difficulty in dichotic listening situations and the nature of these is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ian Dennis (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: