Key result
Heart rate bias minimization via RR interval normalization significantly increased heart rate variability measures, including a 19.8% increase in SDNN for subjects with moderate heart rates.
Why the study?
Heart rate variability depends on average heart rate as well as autonomic nervous system activity, requiring reduction of heart rate influence to improve its utility as an autonomic marker.
Does normalization of the RR interval tachogram reduce heart rate bias in heart rate variability estimation in healthy young adults?
Observational (n=46)
Does normalization of the RR interval tachogram reduce heart rate bias in heart rate variability estimation in healthy young adults?
Normalization of the RR interval tachogram significantly reduces heart rate bias in HRV estimation, particularly in subjects with moderate and fast heart rates.
Background: Heart Rate (HR) is a time varying signal indicating the beating activity of the heart, whereas Heart Rate Variability (HRV) is a noninvasive tool to evaluate the cardiac autonomic regulations. The HRV is widely used to evaluate cardiac/autonomic health in normal healthy as well as chronic diseased population. The HR and HRV are significantly connected with each other. HRV is dependent on the average HR as well on the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) activity. To make the HRV a potential marker of ANS activity, the influence of HR must be reduced. The present study is designed to minimize the effect of HR on HRV by normalization of the RR interval tachogram. Method: Forty six young adults participated in the non-invasive and benign study. 10 minutes of Electrocardiogram (ECG) lead II was recorded in each case in supine position. The electrocardiographic records of the subjects were divided into three groups based on their HR viz., slow, moderate and fast HR. The HRV indices were extracted at pre and post HR bias minimization. Results: The improved HRV was observed with HR bias minimization in all three categories of HR. The reduced HRV was found with increasing heart rate even after HR bias minimization. Conclusion: Significant impact of normalization was found on moderate and fast HR subjects. This suggests that the HRV studies would yield better results with HR bias reduced, thereby improving health monitoring systems based on HRV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jitendra Jain (2020) conducted an observational in Healthy young adults (n=46). Heart rate bias minimization (RR interval normalization) vs. Pre-minimization (standard HRV analysis) was evaluated on Standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN) in moderate heart rate subjects (p=<0.05). Heart rate bias minimization via RR interval normalization significantly increased heart rate variability measures, including a 19.8% increase in SDNN for subjects with moderate heart rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: