Retrospective cohort study compares mortality and complications of bAVF in dialysis patients, indicating key findings.
BACKGROUND: Back-up arteriovenous fistula (bAVF) is used in peritoneal dialysis (PD) to avoid haemodialysis transfer via a central venous catheter (CVC). However, no previous study examined mortality or complications associated with bAVF creation. AIMS: Comparing mortality, haemodialysis transfer overall or with a CVC and vascular access complications (bAVF or CVC) between patients with a bVF and those with no bAVF. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of adult PD patients within an Australian Local Health District (2017-2023). Cox regression models were used for hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Of 115 patents followed up (median of 1.9 years (interquartile range 0.9, 3.5)), 50 (44%) had a bAVF of which 31 (62%) matured. The bAVF group had 56 procedures (1.1/patient), including 32 assisted interventions (0.6/patient). There was no associated difference in mortality between bAVF and no bAVF group (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.6, P = 0.6) or haemodialysis transfer (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.5-2.0, P = 0.9). A bAVF was associated with a lower haemodialysis transfer risk with a CVC (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-0.9, P = 0.04). Complications between the bAVF and no bAVF group were similar (28% vs 14%, P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: bAVF were associated with lower risk of haemodialysis transfer to haemodialysis with a CVC, compared to those with no bAVF. However, there was no difference in mortality, risk of transferring to haemodialysis or complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: